It’s cheaper than SEAT Arona, but it sells very little, why KIA Stonic isn’t happy?

It’s cheaper than SEAT Arona, but it sells very little, why KIA Stonic isn’t happy?

The two models have recently been promoted and are direct rivals in the B-SUV success segment. But the Spanish car sells more than South Korea and we will analyze the reason.

SEAT Arona has emerged in the first three of 2022 as the The best-selling small SUV in Spain, and that has many and interesting opponents. In fact, Arona is the fourth best-selling car in 2022 to date, second only to Volkswagen T-Roc, Hyundai Tucson, and Toyota Corolla.

Among the rival models of Arona, Volkswagen T-Cross, Peugeot 2008, Renault Captur or Hyundai Kona stand out. And, of course, KIA Stonic, which also fails in Europe with respect to sales. What are the reasons for SEAT Arona’s success, despite being more expensive than its South Korean rival?

KITI Arona is similar on the outside, but larger on the inside

Considering that we are talking about family style cars with included sizes, why slightly exceeding 4 meters in heightinternal space is very important for many users.

And in that he KITI Arona It wins over the KIA Stonic despite being similar in external tests. To start, access to the back seats is much better thanks to the large door opening.

Óscar Magro has compared SEAT Arona with KIA Stonic, don’t miss his conclusion.

Not only that, once inside the legroom and headroom allow people over 180 cm travel comfortably and without feeling trapped inside. Of course, Arona’s central square is not used for some reason for two reasons: it is narrow and the transmission tunnel is much larger.

Another important feature of SEAT Arona is its stem, wider than KIA Stonic. Without revealing the seats, the Spanish B-SUV offers 400 liters of capacity for 352 Stonic. And, while Arona can reach 1,280 liters, South Korea remains at 1,155 liters of high volume.

KIA Stonic can be hybrid

If we focus on the engine, the fact is that the KIA Stonic has key points in its favor and that it is likely to get it DGT ECO label through a small hybrid MHEV system for 1 liter mechanics of three cylinders and 100 or 120 hp.

It is true that Arona also offers the possibility of ECO sticker with its 90 hp 1.0 TGI mechanics, but with two problems: power decreases and there is no hybridizationbut to deal with natural gas (CNG), which is currently through the roof and has no compensation.

In addition to the aforementioned ones, Stonic offers a 1.2 Dpi petrol engine with 84 hp hybrid, while Arona completes its technical version with three variants: 1.0 TSI with 95 and 110 hp, and TSI 1.5 with 150 hp.

In both models you can find a manual and two-clutch gear, though on the Stonic side IMT gear box, intelligent intelligent manual box with electronic clutch mechanical replacement. Thanks to this, you can use the candle mode in which the car sometimes moves inertia and the engine is turned off and saves fuel.

SEAT Arona has more power on the road

Another great feature of SEAT Arona is his character on the road, as it gives a a great balance between comfort and strength on the road. It helps to have a separate electronic lock system (XDS), as well as a steering and shift steering wheel.

KIA Stonic, on the other hand, is more gentle and louder. As a result, her travel comfort is lower than that of Arona, which is excellent in this regard.

How much does Arona’s new seat cost?

In terms of price, the KIA Stonic is usually cheaper than the SEAT Arona mechanically with the same hardware.

The Spanish brand B-SUV starts at a price of 21,000 euros, however with offers available at you can stay for only 16,600 euros for accessibility version. The high-frequency variant is a change of 150 hp 1.5 TSI with DSG in the FR Plus finish, which reaches up to 29,778 euros.

In the case of Stonic, prices vary between € 14,534 (5,216 euro savings included) and 24,300 euros for 1.0 T-GDi with 120 hp MHEV iMT Drive Plus.

And you, why do you think Arona’s seat sells for more than KIA Stonic despite being more expensive?


Source link